This lesson will show how data derived from different and unrelated “against-the-law-of
average” predictions, will come together to satisfy another “against-the-law-of average”
prediction. If you don’t quite understand this statement – forget it, and just see how the
lesson works out. The following names were taken from the Old Testament and
converted from their King James spelling to sound-symbol spelling.
The family of JAKoB is listed below. Except for JOSeP, his sons -- MaNNaSEH and
EPRAáM, and his mother, RAHeL, these are the members who accompanied him on his
trip from BEERSEBá to EJyPT (Genesis 46:7-27). They arrived in 2239AA, JAKoB’s
130th year.
JAKoB and LEa (33 sons, 1 daughter).
RUUBeN - HANoH, PaLLU, HeZRoN, KaRMI.
SiMíaN - JeMUáL, JAMiN, OHaD, JAKiN, ZOHaR. SAáL.
LEVI - GeRSoN, KOHaT, MeRARI.
JUDá - eR, ONaN, SELá, PAReZ (his sons were HeZRoN and
HaMUL), ZARa.
ÍSSaKaR - TOLá, PUVa, JoB. SiMRoN.
ZeBULuN – SEReD, ELON, JALEEL.
DINá (daughter).
JAKoB and ZiLPa (16 souls).
GAD – SiPíaN, HaGGI, SUNI, íZBoN, ERI, aRODI, aRELI.
aSeR – JiMNa, iSVa, iSUI, BARIa (his sons were HEBeR and
MaLKiaL), SERá (a sister).
JAKoB and RAHeL (14 children).
JOSeP – MaNNaSEH, EPRAáM.
BeNJaMíN – BELá, BEHeR, aSBeL, GERá, NAáMaN, íHI,
ROS, MOPPiM, HUPPiM, ARD.
JAKoB and BíLHa (7 children).
DaN – HUSiM.
NaPTaLI – JaHZEEL, GUNI, JEZeR, SíLLeM.
These individuals eventually selected mates and sired children. The mate selection
process had guidelines. LABaN’s explanation of the guidelines to JAKoB was, “The
youngers were not allowed to marry before the elders.” The order of the births of JAKoB’
s sons is shown below. Their mothers were LEa and RAHeL, LABaN’s two daughters;
and ZiLPa and BíLHa, the maids of the two daughters, respectively. The order of the
children’s births, their names, numbers, and the identity of their mothers is shown
below.
RUUBeN (43) by LEa.
DaN (54) by BíLHa.
NaPTaLI (395) by BíLHa.
SiMíaN (395) by LEa.
LEVI (71) by LEa.
JUDá (436) by LEa.
GAD (161) by ZiLPa.
aSeR (500) by ZiLPa
íSSaKaR (630) by LEa.
JOSeP (113) BY RAHeL
ZeBULuN (317) by LEa.
DINá (8) by LEa.
BíNONI or BeNJaMíN (370) by RAHeL
NaPTaLI and SiMíaN were born on the same day. RAHeL, BíiLHa's boss, announced,
“With great wrestlings have I wrestled with my sister, and I have prevailed (Genesis 30:
8).” She probably referred to something she had done to shorten BíLHa’s delivery time.
The results -- NaPTaLI was born before SiMíaN, and consequently SiMíaN’s name was
moved to last place on the “mate selection” priority list. His turn came after BeNJaMíN’s
turn.
Because of GoD’s instruction -- be fruitful and multiply -- given to NOá following the
flood, the women began the process of delivering children immediately upon joining their
mate. As each child was born, the number of the day of the 665 day calendar was
noted, and the child was given that number to be used as the basis for deriving its
name. The sound-number relationships used by the child’s family provided the sounds
needed to form the name. Sounds were selected so that their numerical equivalents
tallied to the number of the day of the 665 day calendar on which the child was born.
The results of the women being fruitful and multiplying was that the number of days
between consecutive birthdays of a mother’s children was usually fairly constant. These
results are apparent when the family sound-number links are substituted into the names,
as shown below. These links are listed below.
Put the numbers in the sounds
The code used to form the names of JAKoB’s children who were born on LABaN’s land
was: A=IZAAK=154, E=ABRaM=82, H=0, I=JAKoB=618, O=LABaN=310, U=228
(probably the mate of ABRaM’s grandfather, NAHOR), K=490 on LABaN’s unit), P=627
(on LABaN’s unit). See lesson 3 for an explanation of P and K value calculation.
The sound-number links used in the names of the grandchildren of JAKoB by his wives
LEa and RAHeL were: A=IZAAK=154, E=ABRaM=82, H=0, I=JAKoB=618,
U=aRPaHSaD=505. Before JOSeP’s disappearance O=the number of the child’s father.
After JOSeP’s disappearance, O=JOSeP=113. The K=420 and the P=0 in BEERSEBá,
where these children were born. This P=0 value is different from the value that the P
value calculation demonstrated in lesson 3 would provide. The reason for the apparent
contradiction is presently unknown. This is the first contradiction in this lesson.
The children of DaN and NaPTaLI (grandchildren of JAKoB and BíLHa) used the
following sound-number links: E=ABRaM=82, H=0 or H=258=probably LEa,
I=ABRaM=82, U=228 (probably the mate of ABRaM’s grandfather, NAHOR).
The children of GAD and aSeR, the grandchildren of JAKoB and ZiLPa used these
links: following code: E=JUDá=436, H=258 (probably LEa, I=JUDá=436,
O=JOSeP=113, U=258 (probably LEa) or U=228 (probably the mate of ABRaM’s
grandfather, NAHOR). This H value difference is contradiction number one.
RAHeL’s son, BeNJaMiN and his mate used the following links in their children’s
names: A=LEVI=71, E=SiMiaN=395, I=BeNJaMiN=370, O=258 (probably LEa),
U=505=aRPaHSaD, P in MOPPiM=19, and P in HUPPiM=0. The U value difference is
contradiction number two, and the P=19 in MOPPiM is contradiction number three.
Don’t forget -- the J in the name carried the number of the year AA (after ADAM’s
birth) of the child’s birthday.
When the numbers are plugged into the sounds, the near equality of the number of
days separating the birthdays is apparent. If this is a coincidence, the odds of it
occurring are in the trillions to one.
About the graphs
The seven graphs shown below combine to display a continuous time line from the
birth of JAKoB's oldest son, RUUBeN through the year 2239AA, the year the family
arrived in EJyPT. The graphs identify the day, month, and year (After ADAM) of each of
these 66 members' births, as well as certain other data related to their births. The
following paragraph explains the items.
The children’s names and name-numbers (A) appear in the yellow rectangles. The
blue squares with the white spots at their center (B) are the plotted points of the name-
numbers of the children versus the year of their births (C) by day, month, and year. The
blue horizontal lines (D) that extend left from the years, mark the first day of the year.
The rectangular boxes outlined in red (E) contain the father’s and mother’s names and
numbers (if known) on the top level, and the children’s names, numbers, and the
number of days that separated their birthdays on the lower portion. The two numbers
along the left margin (F) identify days. The top numbers identify the day of the name-
number calendar that falls on the first day of the year. The bottom number is the
accumulated number of days from JOSeP’s birthday until the first day of each year. The
“Moons=” notation (G) identifies the accumulated number of new moons counting from
the new moon of JOSeP’s birthday until the “Moons” notation in question. It also notes
the exact 665 day calendar day of the new moon. The numbers at the bottom of the
example (H) identify the days of the continuous series of 665-day name-numbering
calendars.
The length of a year
Today, households have at least one calendar, and many have more then one, but
in JAKoB’s days it wasn’t like that. No calendars have been found, and no one can
prove what the length of a day was 2,800 years ago.
Bits of scripture from the Old Testament provide the following data. JOSeP’s
seventeenth birthday was close to the same time that he dreamed the sun and moon
and eleven stars made obeisance to him (Genesis 37: 7, 9, 10). When JAKoB heard of
the dream he rebuked JOSeP, and asked him if he truly thought his father and mother
and his eleven brothers would bow down to him. The point is -- there was only one time
in JOSeP’s life when he had a father, mother, and eleven brothers. That time was
shortly after RAHeL had delivered BeNJaMíN. One day earlier and JOSeP would have
had only ten brothers. One day later and he would not have had a mother. The
assumption used in this lesson is that the time of the dream coincided with the birth of
BeNJaMíN.
JOSeP was seventeen when he carried the “evil report” from the sons of BíLHa and
ZiLPa to his father (Genesis 37:2). There’s no explanation of the content of the report,
but the usual assumption is that the two boys were in some way tattling, or being petty.
Actually, the report probably had to do with the fact that RAHeL was having difficulty
delivering her son, BeNJaMíN. The scriptures don’t mention any other evil occurrence
taking places at that time. This story supports the assumptions in the above
paragraphs.
JOSeP was born in 2201AA, therefore his seventeenth birthday was in 2218AA.
RAHeL named her second child BíNONI. JAKoB named him BeNJaMíN. Don't forget --
when doing arithmetic with the 665 calendar numbers, 665=0, and any exact multiple of
665 was also 0.
BíNONI = 2+5+50+310+50+618 = 1035 = 1035-665=370, O=LABaN=310,
I=113=JOSeP.
BeNJaMíN = 370 = 370 + (3 times 665) = 2365.
Year of BeNJaMíN’s birth = 2365-2-0-50-0-40-5-50 = 2218AA.
These calculations are compatible with the assumptions stated above.
A child could have the J sound in his name if he was born during the time of a new
moon. Both JOSeP and BeNJaMíN were born during a new moon phase. A lunar cycle
measures 29.5306 days, so the number of days between JOSeP’s and BeNJaMíN’s
birthdays amounted to 29.5306 times the number of new moons between their
birthdays. The assumption is that 234 new moons separated the birthdays of the two
boys.
234 new moons times 29.5306 = 6910 days = the number of days that separated the
birthdays of JOSeP and BeNJaMíN.
JOSeP’s number, 113, plus 6910 minus ten 665 cycles amounts to 373, which is three
days past BeNJaMíN’s birthday on day number 370, so the actual number of days is
three days less they 6910, or 6907.
If 6907 days amounted to 17 years, then one year would amount to 6907 divided by
17, or 406.3 days. The assumption in this lesson is that a year contains 406.3 days.
The figure seems high, but it’s only a ball park figure, and it can be adjusted sometime
in the future. For now, the number of days in each of the 12 month years shown on the
graphs is 406.2941, and the length of each of the months is 406.2941 divided by 12 =
33.8578 days. Please, accept this data for now, and later in these lessons, see whether
or not it becomes more acceptable.
The graphs
2195AA thru 2203AA or (1805BC thru 1797BC)
The K and P values in BEERSEBá, where all but two of JAKoB’s grandchildren were
born, were 420 and 0, respectively. By using the equation for deriving the K values
shown above, the K value becomes K=420. The P=0 value calculation was derived by a
method other than the normal method used by the descendants of SeM through
aRPaHSaD, but the P=0 in BEERSEBá value has survived many tests. So, when the P
or K sound appeared in the name of a grandchild of JAKoB, the P=0 and the K=420.
This is contradiction number one in this lesson.
2202AA thru 2209AA or 1798BC thru 1791AA
2209AA thru 2216AA or 1791BC thru 1784BC
2215AA thru 2221AA or 1785BC thru 1779BC
2223AA thru 2230AA or 1777BC thru 1770BC
2230AA thru 2237AA or 1770BC thru 1763BC
2234AA thru 2240AA or 1766BC thru 1760AA
The odds of the predictions presented in these lessons actually occurring are infinity
to one. The truly important point isn’t the bits of historical information that is available by
knowing the workings of the system -- the importance is the recognition that some entity
must have derived the system, and instilled it into our ancestors in such a way that it can
be recognized and reconstructed today, after centuries of being lost from their
memories.
An important question is -- who presented it to our ancestors? Where did they come
from? How did they get here? Why did they come here? Did they truly create ADAM,
and if so – why? -- for what purpose? By striving to reconstruct the workings of this
system, we open a road that approaches closer to more accurately realizing the answers
to some of these questions. We spend time working crossword puzzles, seduko puzzles,
cryptograms, jigsaw puzzles, to mention a few, to stimulate our brains. Reconstructing
this system is a really interesting puzzle to work on – a puzzle that could get us thinking
about how we got where we are today.
♢♢♢
average” predictions, will come together to satisfy another “against-the-law-of average”
prediction. If you don’t quite understand this statement – forget it, and just see how the
lesson works out. The following names were taken from the Old Testament and
converted from their King James spelling to sound-symbol spelling.
The family of JAKoB is listed below. Except for JOSeP, his sons -- MaNNaSEH and
EPRAáM, and his mother, RAHeL, these are the members who accompanied him on his
trip from BEERSEBá to EJyPT (Genesis 46:7-27). They arrived in 2239AA, JAKoB’s
130th year.
JAKoB and LEa (33 sons, 1 daughter).
RUUBeN - HANoH, PaLLU, HeZRoN, KaRMI.
SiMíaN - JeMUáL, JAMiN, OHaD, JAKiN, ZOHaR. SAáL.
LEVI - GeRSoN, KOHaT, MeRARI.
JUDá - eR, ONaN, SELá, PAReZ (his sons were HeZRoN and
HaMUL), ZARa.
ÍSSaKaR - TOLá, PUVa, JoB. SiMRoN.
ZeBULuN – SEReD, ELON, JALEEL.
DINá (daughter).
JAKoB and ZiLPa (16 souls).
GAD – SiPíaN, HaGGI, SUNI, íZBoN, ERI, aRODI, aRELI.
aSeR – JiMNa, iSVa, iSUI, BARIa (his sons were HEBeR and
MaLKiaL), SERá (a sister).
JAKoB and RAHeL (14 children).
JOSeP – MaNNaSEH, EPRAáM.
BeNJaMíN – BELá, BEHeR, aSBeL, GERá, NAáMaN, íHI,
ROS, MOPPiM, HUPPiM, ARD.
JAKoB and BíLHa (7 children).
DaN – HUSiM.
NaPTaLI – JaHZEEL, GUNI, JEZeR, SíLLeM.
These individuals eventually selected mates and sired children. The mate selection
process had guidelines. LABaN’s explanation of the guidelines to JAKoB was, “The
youngers were not allowed to marry before the elders.” The order of the births of JAKoB’
s sons is shown below. Their mothers were LEa and RAHeL, LABaN’s two daughters;
and ZiLPa and BíLHa, the maids of the two daughters, respectively. The order of the
children’s births, their names, numbers, and the identity of their mothers is shown
below.
RUUBeN (43) by LEa.
DaN (54) by BíLHa.
NaPTaLI (395) by BíLHa.
SiMíaN (395) by LEa.
LEVI (71) by LEa.
JUDá (436) by LEa.
GAD (161) by ZiLPa.
aSeR (500) by ZiLPa
íSSaKaR (630) by LEa.
JOSeP (113) BY RAHeL
ZeBULuN (317) by LEa.
DINá (8) by LEa.
BíNONI or BeNJaMíN (370) by RAHeL
NaPTaLI and SiMíaN were born on the same day. RAHeL, BíiLHa's boss, announced,
“With great wrestlings have I wrestled with my sister, and I have prevailed (Genesis 30:
8).” She probably referred to something she had done to shorten BíLHa’s delivery time.
The results -- NaPTaLI was born before SiMíaN, and consequently SiMíaN’s name was
moved to last place on the “mate selection” priority list. His turn came after BeNJaMíN’s
turn.
Because of GoD’s instruction -- be fruitful and multiply -- given to NOá following the
flood, the women began the process of delivering children immediately upon joining their
mate. As each child was born, the number of the day of the 665 day calendar was
noted, and the child was given that number to be used as the basis for deriving its
name. The sound-number relationships used by the child’s family provided the sounds
needed to form the name. Sounds were selected so that their numerical equivalents
tallied to the number of the day of the 665 day calendar on which the child was born.
The results of the women being fruitful and multiplying was that the number of days
between consecutive birthdays of a mother’s children was usually fairly constant. These
results are apparent when the family sound-number links are substituted into the names,
as shown below. These links are listed below.
Put the numbers in the sounds
The code used to form the names of JAKoB’s children who were born on LABaN’s land
was: A=IZAAK=154, E=ABRaM=82, H=0, I=JAKoB=618, O=LABaN=310, U=228
(probably the mate of ABRaM’s grandfather, NAHOR), K=490 on LABaN’s unit), P=627
(on LABaN’s unit). See lesson 3 for an explanation of P and K value calculation.
The sound-number links used in the names of the grandchildren of JAKoB by his wives
LEa and RAHeL were: A=IZAAK=154, E=ABRaM=82, H=0, I=JAKoB=618,
U=aRPaHSaD=505. Before JOSeP’s disappearance O=the number of the child’s father.
After JOSeP’s disappearance, O=JOSeP=113. The K=420 and the P=0 in BEERSEBá,
where these children were born. This P=0 value is different from the value that the P
value calculation demonstrated in lesson 3 would provide. The reason for the apparent
contradiction is presently unknown. This is the first contradiction in this lesson.
The children of DaN and NaPTaLI (grandchildren of JAKoB and BíLHa) used the
following sound-number links: E=ABRaM=82, H=0 or H=258=probably LEa,
I=ABRaM=82, U=228 (probably the mate of ABRaM’s grandfather, NAHOR).
The children of GAD and aSeR, the grandchildren of JAKoB and ZiLPa used these
links: following code: E=JUDá=436, H=258 (probably LEa, I=JUDá=436,
O=JOSeP=113, U=258 (probably LEa) or U=228 (probably the mate of ABRaM’s
grandfather, NAHOR). This H value difference is contradiction number one.
RAHeL’s son, BeNJaMiN and his mate used the following links in their children’s
names: A=LEVI=71, E=SiMiaN=395, I=BeNJaMiN=370, O=258 (probably LEa),
U=505=aRPaHSaD, P in MOPPiM=19, and P in HUPPiM=0. The U value difference is
contradiction number two, and the P=19 in MOPPiM is contradiction number three.
Don’t forget -- the J in the name carried the number of the year AA (after ADAM’s
birth) of the child’s birthday.
When the numbers are plugged into the sounds, the near equality of the number of
days separating the birthdays is apparent. If this is a coincidence, the odds of it
occurring are in the trillions to one.
About the graphs
The seven graphs shown below combine to display a continuous time line from the
birth of JAKoB's oldest son, RUUBeN through the year 2239AA, the year the family
arrived in EJyPT. The graphs identify the day, month, and year (After ADAM) of each of
these 66 members' births, as well as certain other data related to their births. The
following paragraph explains the items.
The children’s names and name-numbers (A) appear in the yellow rectangles. The
blue squares with the white spots at their center (B) are the plotted points of the name-
numbers of the children versus the year of their births (C) by day, month, and year. The
blue horizontal lines (D) that extend left from the years, mark the first day of the year.
The rectangular boxes outlined in red (E) contain the father’s and mother’s names and
numbers (if known) on the top level, and the children’s names, numbers, and the
number of days that separated their birthdays on the lower portion. The two numbers
along the left margin (F) identify days. The top numbers identify the day of the name-
number calendar that falls on the first day of the year. The bottom number is the
accumulated number of days from JOSeP’s birthday until the first day of each year. The
“Moons=” notation (G) identifies the accumulated number of new moons counting from
the new moon of JOSeP’s birthday until the “Moons” notation in question. It also notes
the exact 665 day calendar day of the new moon. The numbers at the bottom of the
example (H) identify the days of the continuous series of 665-day name-numbering
calendars.
The length of a year
Today, households have at least one calendar, and many have more then one, but
in JAKoB’s days it wasn’t like that. No calendars have been found, and no one can
prove what the length of a day was 2,800 years ago.
Bits of scripture from the Old Testament provide the following data. JOSeP’s
seventeenth birthday was close to the same time that he dreamed the sun and moon
and eleven stars made obeisance to him (Genesis 37: 7, 9, 10). When JAKoB heard of
the dream he rebuked JOSeP, and asked him if he truly thought his father and mother
and his eleven brothers would bow down to him. The point is -- there was only one time
in JOSeP’s life when he had a father, mother, and eleven brothers. That time was
shortly after RAHeL had delivered BeNJaMíN. One day earlier and JOSeP would have
had only ten brothers. One day later and he would not have had a mother. The
assumption used in this lesson is that the time of the dream coincided with the birth of
BeNJaMíN.
JOSeP was seventeen when he carried the “evil report” from the sons of BíLHa and
ZiLPa to his father (Genesis 37:2). There’s no explanation of the content of the report,
but the usual assumption is that the two boys were in some way tattling, or being petty.
Actually, the report probably had to do with the fact that RAHeL was having difficulty
delivering her son, BeNJaMíN. The scriptures don’t mention any other evil occurrence
taking places at that time. This story supports the assumptions in the above
paragraphs.
JOSeP was born in 2201AA, therefore his seventeenth birthday was in 2218AA.
RAHeL named her second child BíNONI. JAKoB named him BeNJaMíN. Don't forget --
when doing arithmetic with the 665 calendar numbers, 665=0, and any exact multiple of
665 was also 0.
BíNONI = 2+5+50+310+50+618 = 1035 = 1035-665=370, O=LABaN=310,
I=113=JOSeP.
BeNJaMíN = 370 = 370 + (3 times 665) = 2365.
Year of BeNJaMíN’s birth = 2365-2-0-50-0-40-5-50 = 2218AA.
These calculations are compatible with the assumptions stated above.
A child could have the J sound in his name if he was born during the time of a new
moon. Both JOSeP and BeNJaMíN were born during a new moon phase. A lunar cycle
measures 29.5306 days, so the number of days between JOSeP’s and BeNJaMíN’s
birthdays amounted to 29.5306 times the number of new moons between their
birthdays. The assumption is that 234 new moons separated the birthdays of the two
boys.
234 new moons times 29.5306 = 6910 days = the number of days that separated the
birthdays of JOSeP and BeNJaMíN.
JOSeP’s number, 113, plus 6910 minus ten 665 cycles amounts to 373, which is three
days past BeNJaMíN’s birthday on day number 370, so the actual number of days is
three days less they 6910, or 6907.
If 6907 days amounted to 17 years, then one year would amount to 6907 divided by
17, or 406.3 days. The assumption in this lesson is that a year contains 406.3 days.
The figure seems high, but it’s only a ball park figure, and it can be adjusted sometime
in the future. For now, the number of days in each of the 12 month years shown on the
graphs is 406.2941, and the length of each of the months is 406.2941 divided by 12 =
33.8578 days. Please, accept this data for now, and later in these lessons, see whether
or not it becomes more acceptable.
The graphs
2195AA thru 2203AA or (1805BC thru 1797BC)
The K and P values in BEERSEBá, where all but two of JAKoB’s grandchildren were
born, were 420 and 0, respectively. By using the equation for deriving the K values
shown above, the K value becomes K=420. The P=0 value calculation was derived by a
method other than the normal method used by the descendants of SeM through
aRPaHSaD, but the P=0 in BEERSEBá value has survived many tests. So, when the P
or K sound appeared in the name of a grandchild of JAKoB, the P=0 and the K=420.
This is contradiction number one in this lesson.
2202AA thru 2209AA or 1798BC thru 1791AA
2209AA thru 2216AA or 1791BC thru 1784BC
2215AA thru 2221AA or 1785BC thru 1779BC
2223AA thru 2230AA or 1777BC thru 1770BC
2230AA thru 2237AA or 1770BC thru 1763BC
2234AA thru 2240AA or 1766BC thru 1760AA
The odds of the predictions presented in these lessons actually occurring are infinity
to one. The truly important point isn’t the bits of historical information that is available by
knowing the workings of the system -- the importance is the recognition that some entity
must have derived the system, and instilled it into our ancestors in such a way that it can
be recognized and reconstructed today, after centuries of being lost from their
memories.
An important question is -- who presented it to our ancestors? Where did they come
from? How did they get here? Why did they come here? Did they truly create ADAM,
and if so – why? -- for what purpose? By striving to reconstruct the workings of this
system, we open a road that approaches closer to more accurately realizing the answers
to some of these questions. We spend time working crossword puzzles, seduko puzzles,
cryptograms, jigsaw puzzles, to mention a few, to stimulate our brains. Reconstructing
this system is a really interesting puzzle to work on – a puzzle that could get us thinking
about how we got where we are today.
♢♢♢
| JAKoB's move to EJyPT. |
| Lesson 8 |
